In Reply to Mr. James Okuk

In Reply to the ?Good boys? of Dr. Lam Akol

?

By: Kimo Ajing Aba

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

?

?

Since my comment was long enough to be published in the designated column, I have to post it here. This is a reply Mr. James Okuk, via his comment on an article published by Adam Hessain Kawda.

Dear Mr. James Okuk, you have commented to the article written by Adam Hessain Kawda, however, I would like to draw your attention into the followings:-

First: The article was written and published by Adam Hessain and not me.

Second: The web master, Lam Arop Yor, made this as a profound page for all of us. I believe his outstanding effort deserves good credit, because he made this Collo Cyber rock and roll. Hence, his good work and intention must not be watered down in the face of some political differences, ideas and thoughts. Our brother Lam Arop Yor has been embracing many different and conflicting ideas and constantly gave each of them an equal foot on his launched web, Pachodo.org. Here he shows us all a good example of tolerance, perseverance, and the ability to go along with others, despite our differences. Believe me, a lot of people who are not Collo, by origin, are frequently checking-in and out here, in search for latest developments and news.??

Therefore, I personally of the believe that any idea or comment would be gorgeously welcomed on this Pachodo web, even if it comes from non-Collo contributor. This is all that this web is about and meant to be.

With this in mind, it is not out of ignorance when you see an article titled ?How Lam appoints Southerners in his Ministry? appears or surface on here, as far as his writer was capable of articulating legitimate points and reached certain derivations of his own. Instead, this should be a source of healthy debate brother Okuk, unless you think that Dr. Lam Akol Ajawin should be the only political figure to be exonerated by all Collo. This clearly implies that you are advocating for the manifestation of a stereotype person, in the context of ?One Man Show?, who must smell and shine alone. Quiet truly, can this be in the beauty saloons or decorated houses, but amazingly, not in the politics arena.

?

The web administrator, Mr. Lam Arop Yor, is even more related to Dr. Lam Akol, in a way, but knows where to draw the boundaries between what is political, cultural, etc. He did not take it too hard or too far last time, when the article by ?Shilluk International Congress? came up. ?Once more, the bottom line for him, others, and me is the norm of free expression of one?s believes, and the right to speak up one?s mind without cutting off who may be in adverse with you. Now, it seems impossible enough for the tiny crony of Dr. Lam to live and survive amid such fundamental ethics and rules of ?Unity of Collo in their diverse opinions?. All other Collo politicians and intellectuals are adhering and smoothly flawing in this direction. Dr. Lam and his followers are the only exception to the rule.

?

Mr. James Okuk, I do not actually know how closer you are to Dr. Lam Akol and his crony or good boys, but definitely, you should be within his so called: ?Shilluk International Congress?s party?. This underground party with hidden agenda for Collo is the main source of venom and sharp disagreement among Collo today. I said this because this group looks into Dr. Lam Akol Ajawin as a small earthly ?god?, and the smartest politician ever known in Collo Land. Raising an eyebrow against him is like a felony or criminal act. Not only that Lam?s followers are,?? quickly, agitated and disturbed, to the brim of their thinking, when mentioning some of the policies of Dr. Lam. Please if you do not hold any stick there, I request you to take the matter as just politics, which can be debated in an open web. After all, you cannot stop people from saying their opinion and what they believe is the truth. Most importantly, in politics, we can largely agree or disagree. Even we can agree to disagree, as our Leader Comrade/Dr. John Garang De Mabiour, used to say.

?

?

Mr. Okuk, labeling some with ?ignorance? is not a sound politics at all. For my person, I can take that but some would not. If Mr. Adam Hessain did publish his article on another Sudanese web and it has be there for a week, I do not actually know why you did not reply him back there, and in a timely fashion, instead of appearing to be offended enough when the same article came lately to the Pachodo web. Is the Pachodo web is the only battlefield for you, in support of Dr. Lam? ?Joining me to Mr. Adam, as if I am the writer of his article has no point here. Beside, leaving Adam freely somewhere, while trying to corner him here on the Collo web, by itself constitutes the ignorance you are referring to, because you would prefer to fight on the Collo ground and lack information of fighting beyond. Unless, Dr. Lam stood in front of you as Collo politician and leader therefore, all Collo must advocate for the sole purpose of his political agenda and to his beneficiary only. This ?Clanism? and ?Familism? politics have its bad shortcomings with serious repercussions on us as Collo.

It let you openly justify the appointments on relative basis, if the appointees are educationally qualified. Dear Br. Okuk, this is relative nepotism because blood relations would have the final say in the end. Speaking on the corruption in Juba should also draw our attention to what you called ?acceptable-blood relatives appointments. Even if that is happening, you should have bow your head down, and play it low and cool, and seek apology, rather than bringing it up, plainly and try to link it to the CPA. CPA has nothing to do here, or the Collo would have no bite at all in the whole affairs in South Sudan and the SPLA/M, for they can easily enough, be outnumbered by tribes, not to mention.

?

The worst is that these appointments were not meant for giving Collo some rights there, but a mechanism for producing future loyalists for Dr. Lam Akol and his private political agenda. For your information, some of the Lamists?group of supporters have already cut link with the SPLA/M. Others are chanting the Movement, in blasphemy, as a party that cannot render services to its people. Mr. James Okony, Carlo J. Chol, James Okuk, and Dominica Akol Ajawin are few examples. In doing so, they added an insult to the injury the NCP has already inflicted on the SPLA/M. The denunciation of the Movement and call for rallying Collo behind Dr. Lam alone; are the very bases of disunity of Collo, not the vice-versa. It is the SPLA/M which made him to be the first Southern to the Foreign Affairs Ministry. ?Ten years in Khartoum after the Fashoda Agreement brought him nothing than the Ministry of Transportation, which commonly reserved for the marginalized prior to the CPA. It looks really funny and excremental to leave rubbish where you got food. No logic justifies that except the greed and selfishness.

?

The time has now come for this Trojan horse to be abandoned by the Lamists, and with Mr. James Okuk left inside the horse, with a limbless leg hanging out; he could not catch up with the group but kept the SPLA/M flute in mouth. I am sorry to say that but I am a barking dog as stated by James Okony. Nevertheless, dogs do not bark out of nothing. Their braking sends us warning signs of what lie upfront or ahead. Likewise, loud noises from a tin cautious a lot and warn others from certain danger and imminent risk. Dear sisters, Dominica Akol Ajawin, per your interesting quotation of mosquito bite; it is good that you said I am not even a mosquito bite to your father. That is so true, because I did not intend to harm Dr. Lam or who ever he has appointed in the Foreign Affairs Ministry. I do not bear any hate towards any one there. What makes me differ with you and some of them is your tendency that, all Collo shrines should be turned towards Dr. Lam Akol.

?

Sincerely speaking, for some one who could not feel an ease with the Reth, Kwong Dak Padiet and the Pachodo system and way of approach, cannot lead or rally Collo behind him, whatsoever. Similar attempts were made in the past to destabilize the thrown of Reth in Pachodo, yet those efforts reaped no fruits. Not only that, some of these politicians got cursed and bad lack. ??

I clearly noticed that some, among? your group would like to see Dr. Lam ahead on the top of the highest political plateau in the South or even Collo Land, but to do what there this is what I can not understand. For the famous Collo proverb says that if you cannot stand up and rule in your own village, you cannot rule the entire community. Vaunting with specialized educational degree of Ph to the point of disagreement with the Reth of Collo, constitute an indelible curse Dr. Lam and the fact the he would make it nowhere.

?

Brother, James Otuk, you have mentioned in your comment to Adam Hessain that Dr. Lam Akol the Foreign Minister, gave some seats ascertained for the Southerners in the Foreign Ministry, to some from Blue Nile and Nuba Mountain. Is this too not a breach to the CPA? Why would you like to talk about Adam?s opinion and consider it a mistake and complete ignorance, while dashing aside the ?gross mistake? of your political icon and leader?s?

Your reasoning was that the Foreign Minister gave that out of kindness. Well and good! Have you witnessed a protocol signed in Machakos, Nyayo, and Nakuro by name ?kindness protocol?? ?No body at all witnessed that unless signed on the back of Dr. John Garang De Mabiour, between Dr. Lam Akol Ajawin and H.E. Ali Osman Mohamed Taha.

The boosty and bossy language you narrated in jotting down the good many characters in Dr. Lam Akol, are in themselves sick ideas by which a politician can rely onto for support. These characters in him are also in others, or somewhere else. Additionally, it infers weaknesses somewhere, in the same personality, which construe the furious defense and fight put forward by the followers.

For instance, you mentioned that: ?he is ever a hard-working man who never intoxicate his intellect with Alcohol or drugs?- in this you are bettering him over those working hard but they do drink. Fine, let me cite to you the following example:-

President George W. Bush was a habitual drunkard for many years, yet he became president of the United States of America and was behind the CPA and realization of Peace in Sudan. Notably, I do not appreciate the Republican policies in this country, but here is a unique example I quietly agree with and I would like to bring to your attention. On the contrary, William Jefferson Clinton (Bill Clinton) became president of the USA, from a party I personally admire a lot. Clinton was so good, so famous to the extent that, while in power, economy was steadfast and booming that many people from around the globe planed to immigrate and live in America, indefinitely. ?Nevertheless, his sexual instincts almost put him on the verge of being voted out from the white House.

?Again, here sexuality cannot be better than drinking; rather it is worse indeed and a deadly syndrome. Therefore, such extreme sexual lusts cannot spare relative or friend. Even wife?s siblings or cousins, can be an easy preys ?in the face of a sex machine that knows no intellectually, cleverness, and high I.Q., but its rules of prevalence.

And if need be, killing and poisoning can are always alternative tools, necessary for the fulfillment of hidden desires.

?

??????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????Take care!

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Kimo Ajing Aba