UNITED NATIONS |
The U.N. negotiations on Sudan and South Sudan, former civil war foes that split when the south seceded last year, follow weeks of border fighting that have raised fears Khartoum and Juba could launch an all-out war, after failing to resolve a string of disputes over oil revenues and border demarcation.
Delegates from the 15-nation Security Council met on Monday for several hours at the U.S. mission in New York to try to reach an agreement on amending a U.S.-drafted resolution on the two Sudans that council members hope to put to a vote later this week, Western diplomats told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
After their discussions, the United States circulated a revised draft resolution that threatens both Sudan and South Sudan with "additional measures" under Article 41 of the U.N. charter, which allows the council to impose economic and diplomatic sanctions on countries that ignore its decisions.
"The draft will probably change before it goes to a vote, which we hope will happen on Wednesday," a diplomat told Reuters. "China doesn't want any mention of Article 41."
Beijing, which has close trade relations with both Khartoum and Juba, has traditionally acted as Sudan's protector on the council and for years has shielded it from U.S. and European calls for sanctions due to its handling of conflicts in its western Darfur region and elsewhere in the country.
Russia is supporting China's push to water down the resolution and also dislikes the idea of mentioning Article 41 in the resolution, council diplomats said. Article 41 does not authorize military intervention.
RUSSIAN RELUCTANCE
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made clear at a joint news conference in Moscow on Monday with visiting Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Ahmed Karti that Russia has reservations about threatening the two Sudans with punitive measures.
He also suggested that Russia did not want any automatic triggers for sanctions in the draft resolution.
"Yes, some economic measures could be taken but ... this is not an automatic decision, but only an indication, depending on how the resolution is implemented," Lavrov said.
Under the latest U.S. draft, as with two previous versions, the council would have to pass a new resolution to impose sanctions on either Khartoum or Juba for not ending hostilities.
The United States made an attempt to soften the language in the latest draft. The first version, obtained by Reuters, warned Khartoum and Juba of "its determination, in the event that one or both of the parties have not complied, to take appropriate additional measures under Article 41 of the (U.N.) Charter."
The latest version, also obtained by Reuters, softens it by speaking of the council's "intention" to take steps under Article 41 in the event of non-compliance.
The African Union's Peace and Security Council last week urged both sides to cease hostilities and withdraw troops from disputed areas, and warned it would issue its own binding rulings if they failed to strike deals on a string of disputes within three months.
The U.S.-drafted Security Council resolution is intended to reinforce the AU declaration by making it legally binding.
Russia has traditionally been reluctant to impose sanctions on any nation, calling them counterproductive.
Sudan's Karti said on Monday in Moscow that Sudan had armed forces on the border with South Sudan for legitimate protection.
"This is within the borders of Sudan and not outside of Sudan and this is our right, we can deploy our forces anywhere," he said. "We're not at all preparing ourselves for war."
On Sunday, South Sudan told the United Nations it would pull all police out of a disputed region on its border with Sudan.
(Additional reporting by Lidia Kelly in Moscow; Editing by Paul Simao)
Newer articles:
- S. Sudanese 'kidnapped to fight', envoy tells AFP - StarAfrica.com - 01/05/2012 18:00
- Ukraine, South Sudan share place in Freedom House's press freedom rating - Interfax - 01/05/2012 16:01
- UN warns about South Sudan hunger after fighting - Daily Herald - 01/05/2012 15:20
- Conflict Simmers Between Sundan, South Sudan - NPR - 01/05/2012 10:46
- African Markets - Factors to watch on May 1 - Reuters - 01/05/2012 08:02
Older news items
- UN debating how to end Sudan-South Sudan fight - U.S. News World Report - 30/04/2012 23:52
- UN debating how to end Sudan-South Sudan fight - Fox News - 30/04/2012 23:11
- UN debating how to end Sudan-South Sudan fight - WIS - 30/04/2012 23:04
- South Sudan: Exposing the Hypocrisy of the Rhetoric of Racism in the War of ... - Tucson Citizen - 30/04/2012 22:01
- Diplomats Visits Foreigners Detained in Sudan - ABC News - 30/04/2012 21:46
Latest news items (all categories):
- The power struggles among South Sudan’s political leaders are the direct cause of its ongoing conflict - 11/07/2026 14:03
- Celebrating Independence In The Midst Of Sorrow - 11/07/2026 13:41
- South Sudan resumes oil-backed financing - 11/07/2026 13:33
- Press statement: Strive For National Unity In Honor Of South Sudan's Independence - 10/07/2026 21:23
- Fifteen years of independence for South Sudan, but still little to celebrate - 10/07/2026 21:23
See also (all categories):
Random articles (all categories):
- Sudan war lays bare 'fault lines' between capital and periphery - 17/05/2023 06:50
- Appointment of Sandra Bona Malwal is NOT a Miscalculation. - 18/07/2010 01:00
- Promoting East Africa as the Top African Exploration Marke - 16/09/2021 03:25
- South Sudan boat sinking toll rises to 40 - News24 - 17/09/2012 16:08
- Why Media Literacy Should Become Our Newest National Defence - 29/05/2026 15:49
Popular articles:
- Who is the darkest person in the world, according to Guinness World Record? - 25/10/2022 02:34 - Read 147773 times
- School exam results in South Sudan show decline - 01/04/2012 17:58 - Read 27845 times
- Top 10 weakest currency exchange rates in Africa in 2023 - 19/07/2023 00:24 - Read 24935 times
- No oil in troubled waters - 25/03/2014 15:02 - Read 24255 times
- NDSU student from South Sudan receives scholarship - In-Forum - 29/09/2012 01:44 - Read 22166 times