In S. Sudan, churches struggle to keep role as trusted peacemakers

Juba, South Sudan — Wearing an immaculate white cassock, Catholic Bishop Paride Taban strides through the mud and tents of the Jebel displaced persons camp in South Sudan^[1]’s capital Juba on a recent Sunday.

The camp is hardly sacred ground: thousands of ethnic Nuer live here under United Nations peacekeeper protection in fear of Dinka soldiers outside. But Bishop Taban is here to conduct mass anyway.

“The church is to be with the suffering people, wherever in the world,” the 78-year-old bishop says.

Taban has no trouble crossing South Sudan’s ethnic lines to preach on Sundays. That’s because in South Sudan, church leaders are held in higher esteem than perhaps anyone else.

They earned that position through fifty years of struggle. During South Sudan’s long wars for independence from the hardline Islamist government in Khartoum^[2], Sudan^[3], priests and pastors brought humanitarian relief to civilians during the heaviest fighting. They lobbied the international community to support the southern cause, and, crucially, brokered peace between communities torn apart by war and ethnic strife.

Yet in South Sudan’s latest civil war, which just entered its second year, church leaders have been unable to seriously influence politicians and generals. Instead, they’ve been attacked by militants, sidelined at peace talks, and silenced at home.

It’s a shocking change for South Sudan, a country whose existence in many people’s minds is founded on the idea of religious freedom for Christians, who form the vast majority of the population. Now, church leaders are saying they have to escalate their efforts to be a neutral, trusted force that can bring politicians in line, and lead the divided populace to reconciliation.

From the start, church leaders were shards of light in a grim conflict. Priests, pastors, and nuns protected civilians from extremists on either side, at times standing up to armed men with little more than a cross necklace for protection.

Yet in Juba and in flashpoint towns of Bor and Malakal, which saw some of the heaviest fighting, churches or clergy came under attack. Priests were murdered, and in some instances, civilians were slaughtered in churches where they sought refuge. The Presbyterian church alone lost nine clergy. By May, civilians were leaving church compounds, saying they no longer felt safe inside.

“In this situation, like in Rwanda, the blood of the tribe has become thicker than the blood of the Christ,” says Episcopal Bishop Enock Tombe, who leads a religious delegation at the peace talks.

By mid-year, as the fighting died down with the onset of rains, so did direct violence against churches. But another problem arose. The churches could not get their voices heard.

The warring parties refused church participation in peace negotiations until June, and repeatedly boycotted the talks afterward to avoid religious groups and other non-armed actors from participating.

In government-controlled areas, Catholic radio stations have been censored and shut down, with staff thrown in jail. There are reports of rebel hardliners threatening or even attacking pastors preaching moderation in their areas.

Government security agents even attempted to shut down a Catholic church-led peace march in Juba yesterday to mark the war’s first anniversary.

But the attacks have not stopped South Sudan's religious leaders from speaking out,though. Clergy have condemned the violence in increasingly militant terms, labeling the fighting “evil,” calling the country’s leaders “dry bones” in need of spiritual renewal. They’ve urged civilians not to follow the warlords like “cattle,” and lamented that politicians view those who die as “just grasshoppers,” not caring.

Meanwhile, other leaders like Taban—known for his non-judgmental approach to peacebuilding in previous wars—have used more conciliatory approaches, attempting to consult and advise.

But the politicians have not changed course.

“Has it fallen in a dead ear?” asks Taban, who says he has been trying for months to have a private meeting with President Kiir without success.

“The political leaders think that their side of the story is always correct they don’t want contradiction,” says Bishop Tombe. “[They ask us], why do you speak as if you are with the rebels?”

References

1. ^{^} Title: Southern Sudan (www.csmonitor.com)
2. ^{^} Title: Khartoum (www.csmonitor.com)
3. ^{^} Title: Sudan (www.csmonitor.com)
4. ^{^} Title: Salva Kiir (www.csmonitor.com)