South Sudan worked with Israeli surveillance company to monitor citizens, Amnesty finds

South Sudan Flag (Flickr)

The South Sudanese government obtained surveillance capabilities from an Israeli company between at least 2015 and 2017 in order to wiretap citizens’ phones, according to an Amnesty International investigation published Tuesday.

The company, Verint Systems Ltd., a subsidiary of U.S.-based Verint Systems Inc., worked with the government of South Sudan to provide “communications interception equipment and annual support services,” according to documents reviewed by Amnesty International^[2].

As part of the arrangement, South Sudan required Vivacell, a telecommunications company, to pay Verint at least $762,236 in order to intercept citizens’ communications, according to Amnesty’s assessment^[3].

The reports of South Sudan’s National Security Service’s (NSS) intrusive surveillance^[4] meld into a pattern of dangerous human rights^[5] abuses in South Sudan, including prolonged detention, extrajudicial killings and the silencing of government critics, human rights activists and journalists, according to Amnesty. A United Nations Panel of Experts found in 2016^[6] that NSS’ “ability to identify and illegally apprehend individuals has been significantly enhanced … because it has acquired additional communications interception equipment from Israel.”

One former employee of Vivacell told Amnesty that NSS has maintained direct access to all telecommunications service providers in the country using Israeli surveillance technology in order to wiretap phones. Another former employee of another telecommunications company, MTN South Sudan, said that as far back as 2013 the NSS worked with an Israeli firm that installed abox at their company, which could be used to monitor communications.

Neither the South Sudanese Embassy in the U.S. nor Verint immediately returned requests for comment.

The reported multi-pronged government surveillance operation in South Sudan is a stark reminder of the chilling effect surveillance can have on speech, and raises questions about the extent to which the private sector is a participant in South Sudan’s government surveillance, Amnesty said.

“Telecoms and surveillance technology companies have a responsibility to respect human rights in all their business operations,” Amnesty International’s Director for East and Southern Africa Deprose Muchena said in a statement. “Providing the NSS surveillance systems when there is a significant human rights risk and giving them unchecked access to telecoms networks is a dereliction of the companies’ responsibilities.” 

Activists interviewed by Amnesty said they avoid speaking about sensitive topics on the phone and resort to speaking in person or on encrypted^[7] chat applications.

“The threat of surveillance is a weapon in itself — government critics and human rights activists told us they live in constant fear of being spied on,” Muchena said.

Amnesty is calling on South Sudanese authorities to step in and curtail the NSS’s surveillance operations and to investigate cases of unlawful surveillance and other human rights violations.

According to Privacy International, Verint has also supplied surveillance capabilities to security agencies in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan^[8].

Amnesty International also wants authorities in Israel^[9] to pay attention to the alleged human rights abuses in South Sudan and to examine whether its export licensing framework adequately works to prevent Israel-based technology firms from enabling or perpetrating harms elsewhere.

“The Government of Israel should create an effective and transparent export licensing regime that prevents exports of dual use surveillance equipment to countries where there is a likelihood that the exported surveillance equipment will be used to violate human rights,” the Amnesty International report on South Sudan states.

Amnesty International has previously attempted to reign in the export license of another Israel-based software surveillance firm, NSO Group^[10], in order to try preventing abuses of its equipment around the world. Amnesty requested that an Israeli judge revoke the firm’s export license^[11], citing alleged surveillance using NSO Group technologies of government critics and journalists in Mexico, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The judge denied that request last year^[12].

NSO Group has denied its spyware^[13] can be used outside of tracking terrorism and other crimes.

Israel’s Embassy in the U.S. did not immediately return request for comment.

References

1. ^{^} Posts by Shannon Vavra (www.cyberscoop.com)
2. ^{^} Amnesty International (www.cyberscoop.com)
3. ^{^} Amnesty’s assessment (www.amnesty.org)
4. ^{^} surveillance (www.cyberscoop.com)
5. ^{^} human rights (www.cyberscoop.com)
6. ^{^} United Nations Panel of Experts found in 2016 (www.undocs.org)
7. ^{^} encrypted (www.cyberscoop.com)
8. ^{^} Verint has also supplied surveillance capabilities to security agencies in Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan (www.privacyinternational.org)
9. ^{^} Israel (www.cyberscoop.com)
10. ^{^} NSO Group (www.cyberscoop.com)
11. ^{^} Amnesty requested that an Israeli judge revoke the firm’s export license (www.cyberscoop.com)
12. ^{^} judge denied that request last year (www.cyberscoop.com)
13. ^{^} spyware (www.cyberscoop.com)