It is very true that, in any human being can not put two spoons in his or her mouth at the same time simply, because there is no way for you to do that, but why these NCP are doing it.? And that is what the world will be interesting to see from Khartoum government.
The Northern Sudanese have a secretecy thoughts that, Black Christian African will not rule them in Sudan perhaps, this is why they were been successfully in attempted to murdered William Deng Nhial that was about to beat up Northern politicians including Sadiq al Mahdi. They have been consistently saying the Sudan nation will be rule in Sharia law when the reality check, Sudan is the combination of many ethnic traditional beliefs mostly the majority are none Arab cultures and now they are saying, we want to united Sudan with their Sharia law which sound silly to them and will be accepted by many people in Sudan.
It is unbelievable if anyone have not taken that moment to observed the Khartoum government, they says one thing Today and Tomorrow they came up with another different things showing that, they are not only out of touch people but certainly, the Khartoum government is not going to survive in time to come. One of Southern Sudanese can thank Uganda president for keeping all Sudan's documents of many years on peace talks during two decades of the SPLA/M with Sudan government led by Omar Hassan Ahmed al Bashir and I think others people also would says yes, Uganda president was trying to clarify precisely the Sudan\'s case to United Nation Assemble and I am assuming if you are among those which I might think this way then, the Road is smooth for you to go. According to ''Uganda president, the North Sudan did choose the Letter of Sharia law '' quote, they will not change even if Southern Sudanese want to create New Sudan that is what they Northern Sudanese have been sticking on meanwhile, the SPLM have chosen the letter of self-determination, because it was very clear in the peace talk that, Northern Sudan were unwillingly to dropped off the Sharia law during the peace agreement in Kenya and the rest of the world agree on both sides that, if the Northern Sudan have chosen to keep Sharia law and the SPLM took self-determination without any doubt then, the world witness seem that, there is nothing wrong in either side since if both sides were agreeing on but why now Omar al Bashir is threaten Southern Sudan when Salve Kiir Mayardit announced that, he will not vote for Sudan unity but separation as the fact that, Salve Kiir himself is the resident of Southern Sudan and there is an individual responsibility rights and he has the right also to vote no or yes, base on what he knows. Whoever in Khartoum can not site at his home because the separation of Southern Sudan can not let Northern Sudan sitting to do others things and they felt bad when hearing Southern Sudan are going to be a New Sudan nation but maybe our Southern Sudanese people can says, why these Northern Sudanese brothers don't feel bad about 2.5 million lost their lives and others people may ask why they don't feel bad when Southern Sudanese people are dying in many terms you and I might mentioning diseases, food shortage and Islamic agendas from Northern Sudan in trying to cleansing up the none Arab in Sudan which have been blamed in Sudan's killing innocent such as the Darfurian.
The Khartoum behave badly It wouldn\'t surprising me at all to see those Northern Sudanese reacting very negatively after the United Nation Assemble, but I was stunning to hear that, Omar al Bashir is saying, his government will give all kinds of budgets to Southern Sudan such as loan, grant and even asserting that, if possible the Southern Sudan will exceeded 100% of the oil revenue and the first thing come to my mind is that,these Arab in Northern Sudan have been really punishing Southern Sudanese truly by economically, militarally otherwise, the Khartoum government wouldn't do that by doing it intentional thus, this is the proof to show that, these Arab brothers in Sudan were eventually discriminating none Arab in Sudan's government. Supposedly, the Southern Sudanese should be treated dearly equally to North part as well as many others regions in the Sudan unfortunately, it did not happen in that way it should be and I think that language from Omar al Bashir will not change the minds of Southern Sudanese people at least we need to see another Addis Ababa referendum to happen which is a dump Idea.
I am not one of those very thoughtfully psychologist expertise people to examine what is in the minding of our brothers in Northern Sudanese Arab African, but I would go ahead in suggesting that an individuals Southern Sudanese and the rest of the worldwide may have a fan boy list of brainstorming starting with the dynamic of Omar al Bashir circle, but I think someone will prove me wrong if mention the reluctant by Khartoum government is something obviously and it is true also to say Khartoum government are now preaching for another calamity which mean they did not satisfying during two decades when 2.5 million Sudanese nationals lost lives however, one from the SPLM and I '' quote the peace agreement was not a donation on either side which is true and meaningful to me but the Sudan government have been refuted and they renege for what they signed in Kenya and my question is that, would the threaten on Southern Sudanese will work.? We have been living fear for more than 40 years since the Sudan gained its independence from British colonial and I wish North Sudan must not show that kind of fear tactics because it will not work for Southern Sudanese and they should have acknowledge very carefully that, if the fear tactices did not work in two decades of civil war between North Sudan and Southern Sudan is there any reason for NCP to come up with the dead Ideas of saying they are not going to recognizing the referendum result if came positively independence for New State. Basically, Southern Sudan have been begging Northern Sudanese that, we need the accountability of which the leader must be a sincerely person who can treat all people equally for justice, equally for development and liquidity unfortunately, the dominators Arab African in the Sudan have been spending years in trying to tear up natives and united his part call Arab in the Sudan.
Finally, there is another question if someone can make a fan boy list, because there will be a lots of things come up before Southern Sudan referendum's result and that unknown question is the dropping of Sharia law in order for Southern Sudanese to accept Sudan's unity if that the case then, it will not change our minds either although this suggestion is seem to be very logic I am very sure that it will come up possibly but my answer will be no why because our problems we Southern Sudanese people were not merely the Sharia law alone, but it was very generally that, things were all not right for none Arab in the Sudan particularly Southern Sudan,Nubia Mountains, Blue Nile and now the Darfur and that need the whole Sudan government to be change and started from zero if the April election was a durable one and that dream of Sudan's united would have been achieve it, people were having hope that, there will be free and fair election but did not happen in a way everyone thought and I would leave this question to be answer by Southern Sudanese people. Why the NCP want to see a good election free and fair in Southern Sudan's referenda when the last April election was a gimmick.?
Newer news items:
- Final Communiqué of Southern Sudan Parties - 21/10/2010
- Best Gift God Gave South Sudan Is Unity of Its Leaders at this Moment - 18/10/2010
- South Sudan to form transitional government - 18/10/2010
- Gen. Tanginye becomes latest southern figure to defect to SPLM - 15/10/2010
- The history of the development of urban centers lesson for government of the Southern Sudan - 15/10/2010
Older news items:
- Contribution of Southern Sudanese to the Independence - 11/10/2010
- Recommendation to Overcome Abyei CPA's Stalemate - 10/10/2010
- A Call for a Political Settelement to the Land Grabbing Conflicts in the Chollo Kingdom - 08/10/2010
- AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT ON THE GROWTH OF MALAKAL TOWN, 1908 - 1955 - 08/10/2010
- BORDERS SHOULD BE LEFT OPEN - 08/10/2010
Popular news items:
- The Final Communique of SPLM-DC Third Session of the National Council - 29/03/2011 - Read 65001 times
- Roles and Definition of Political Parties - 29/04/2011 - Read 56172 times
- Agriculture in Southern Sudan: Challenges and Investment Opportunities - 06/10/2010 - Read 33739 times
- Fashoda Youth Forum Rehabilitation of Drainage Culverts in Malakal town Report - 07/08/2008 - Read 26617 times
- Dozens of gunmen on horseback ambush peacekeepers - 24/05/2008 - Read 24094 times