interview
By Asumpta LattusThe leaders of three East African nations have been visiting South Sudan to discuss the peace process in the war-torn nation.
Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Ugandan Prime Minister Ruhakana Rugunda met South Sudan's President Salva Kiir in Juba on Wednesday.
The talks came just two days after Kiir and his rival former Vice President Riek Machar accepted mutual responsibility for ten months of fighting in a declaration signed in Arusha, Tanzania on Monday. Previous deals between the two have crumbled within days. Thousands have been killed in the hostilities which erupted in December 2013 and almost two million have fled their homes.
How close is South Sudan to peace?
The parties came up with a declaration that will actually pave the way for the fragmented SPLM leadership to be reunited once again, if the agreement is signed in Addis Ababa. I can say that - based on the Arusha agreement and on the breakthrough that happened in Bahir Dar in the fifth session of the IGAD peace process. If the rebels are now able to accept the basis of negotiation for power sharing, then the breakthrough is likely to be achieved.
You mentioned the Arusha Declaration - there you agreed to reunite the divided ruling party. What will this mean for President Salva Kiir?
The declaration talked about the SPLM coming together - to pave the way for conventions which will actually be the determining factor for the leadership of the SPLM. It is not for the Arusha Declaration to talk about the future of President Salva Kiir as the chairman of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement, but it is the people and the members of the SPLM in a convention that will decide on the leadership of President Salva Kiir.
Do you think that this will work in South Sudan?
All the things that happened in the eyes of the people of South Sudan - these are the processes that will be decided by the South Sudanese themselves.
You say that it is the people of South Sudan who are going to decide, or who should decide, if they do, or do not, want this or that. But the people who are fighting - they are not the South Sudanese but rather Salva Kiir and Riek Machar. What would you say about this?
That's not true, my dear, because these are the leaders of the people. President Salva Kiir was elected by the people of South Sudan. We are a democratic country. Should people decide to vote for someone else in the next election, then President Salva Kiir will leave power. But if the people of South Sudan still support President Salva Kiir, then President Salva Kiir is not alone.
Machar was vice president to Salva Kiir and as vice president he was running mate to the president during the 2010 election. So you cannot say it is Salva Kiir and Riek Machar that are making the war. It is the war that has divided the people of South Sudan. So it is the people of South Sudan who decide at the end of the day.
Was it wrong of the international comnmunity to insist that Preisdent Salva Kiir and Riek Machar sit down at a table and discuss these things. Should it have been done differently?
The role of the international community is very much appreciated in South Sudan. We cannot do without it - we are not an island. So the role of the international community is correct. But what we do say is that it is equally important that all exercise of the role of international community has to be in conjunction with the people of South Sudan, realizing that they also need peace and it is they who will eventually bring peace to South Sudan.
Ateny Wek Ateny is a spokesman for South Sudan's President Salva Kiir
Source http://allafrica.com/stories/201410231282.html
Newer articles:
- South Sudan Conflict: Women on Sex Strike 'Until Husbands Stop Fighting' - 24/10/2014 12:00
- South Sudan women considering denying sex to husbands in bid to end war - 24/10/2014 08:54
- South Sudan Looks to Livestock to Break Oil Dependence - 23/10/2014 22:02
- South Sudan Crisis Threatens Development - 23/10/2014 17:35
- South Sudan women suggest sex strike to end war - 23/10/2014 16:57
Older news items
- Chinese peacekeepers expected in South Sudan at start of 2015: U.N - 23/10/2014 08:26
- UN in South Sudan sees possible deal but no peace - 23/10/2014 01:47
- UN: ‘Guns Must Be Silenced’ in S. Sudan - 22/10/2014 21:05
- South Sudan sexual violence 'rampant': UN - 22/10/2014 12:01
- East African leaders in South Sudan to push for peace - 22/10/2014 12:00
Latest news items (all categories):
- UN experts say South Sudan is close to securing a $13 billion oil-backed loan from a UAE company - 18/05/2024 11:54
- DRC, South Sudan units top Equity’s earnings in first quarter - 18/05/2024 11:49
- Innuendos and tittle tattle of Kiir's regime - 18/05/2024 11:44
- South Sudan government, rebel groups sign pact to achieve lasting peace - 18/05/2024 09:58
- إلى متى ينظر الجميع إلى الفيل و يطعنون ظله..؟ - 15/05/2024 21:51
Random articles (all categories):
- Report exposes U.N. camp abuses, but research shows justice is elusive - 28/09/2022 02:00
- Appeal for donation of funds for Building Ark Ferry Boat - 07/08/2008 13:35
- Bangladeshi engineering troops bring football joy to Makpandu, Western Equatoria State - 19/01/2022 10:00
- Seeing Success Through Braille in South Sudan - 19/12/2021 17:00
- South Sudan fuel crisis crippling services and drivers - 18/03/2016 03:52
Popular articles:
- Who is the darkest person in the world, according to Guinness World Record? - 25/10/2022 02:34 - Read 35588 times
- No oil in troubled waters - 25/03/2014 15:02 - Read 21875 times
- School exam results in South Sudan show decline - 01/04/2012 17:58 - Read 20768 times
- NDSU student from South Sudan receives scholarship - In-Forum - 29/09/2012 01:44 - Read 17454 times
- With prisons full, South Sudan to introduce mobile courts to clear backlog of cases - 11/10/2012 11:29 - Read 14236 times