Dear, Lwanyo Awang exactly you brought up the point, and I completely agree with your point concerning the misunderstanding of SPLM to the partnership. HE Dr Lam Akol was removed from the ministry of foreign affairs because he was accused of excuting and implementing the directives of the president who is not from SPLM party, and the other hiden accusation was that HE Dr Lam used the unacceptable languages to the movement groups in Darfur, although any group who fight against the government in any country is called rebel regardless they have rights or not, the act is considered as against the law of the country. Now what is new? why the SPLM forces in integrated units forces were ready to defend on Umdurman when attacked by JEM. And why HE Kiir accepted the directives from the president to head the committee assigned to deal with the ICC case? if the logic is that any SPLM minister who excuting the directives of the presidency is implementing the programmes of NCP, shall we say that HE Kiir is implementing the agenda of NCP? I think being in a bush is a different thing from being in the national unity government where there is regulations and rules to be followed by any minister in the cabnit regardless of his Party. But HE Kiir could not be blamed but the blame should go to these guys who are claimed the ownership of the SPLM because they are the ones who misadviced the president of SPLM. These unexperienced young politicians in SPLM should respect the leaders who are very rich with the experience to deal wisely with the issues of our country and they should be given chances for the sake of SPLM and Sudan in general

But Kir is the President, World wide people gives advises and is up presidents to abide with it or not .
in my opinion we don't have to look for somebody else to blame, since he's the one who makes final decision as chief executive.

There are two ways to go:

Either he has aplogize for his act,then we people may forgive him.

Or he takes the blame directly, no body else.

If we are to believe his essay, Or maybe Mr. Kiir saved his best performance for last. ... in Fairfield: "What's missing here is not good plans, it's leadership,"to says. ... When he took his decree to acted upon Dr. Lam Akol leaderships, we called it trial and errors decree abosulately. President Kiir was dotting of Dr Lam Akol, due to his days and Nights advisers. But,atlest we should open the door to everyone to governances that critical post to see who is who!!!
SPLM party members are not in good leaderships among each others, because everyone give his vision. forgetting public vision.
The speech touched off controversy among southerners leaders, some formally challenging Akol's remarks as unfair and improper, others defending his positions.
Aban Aban

As I have mentioned prevoiusly, and will still mention in the future ,for every collo to listen that HE.Dr. Lam Akol was not removed from power in the ministry of external affairs becouse his policy does not comply with policy of SPLM nor was he inconsistent . But becouse their is a lobby behind President Kiir that forsees that future election will not put him in competency with those among them is Dr.Lam if it happen that he is one of the candidate nominated. Thusto put him in a valnerable situation politically he have to depowerhim and remove his influence before its too late .They should leave him idle wih out legitimate groud for his influence and competition .and this may possibly to happen to any one who may begin to grow influence on the masses and that eventually may lead increase the possibility of the demand of the public for more competent President that may increase the chance of demcratic transformation and transfer of power to those who have alarge base of public influence like H.E secretary general Mr.Pagan Amum H.E Dr.Lam Akol among others .Therefore let it be clear that something is behind the mind of those who advice the H.E President Salva kiir Myardit that could not be rule out as ,justice and fairness.But any way south sudan is a home of all people .We should develop a very strong machanism to push for our rights asone of the strong contributors to the sucess SPLA/SPLM to retrieved and restoring the looted rights of southerner from NCP/NIF of Khartoum.

This is a good analytical article from Wad Awang. Whether adviced wrongly or not, Kiir must be blamed directly for his victimization of Dr. Lam for no founded reasons as far as the conduct of government is concerned. He was the one who issued the final decision of the SPLM Party not his advisers or the politically immature so-called Original SPLM who have No 'Original Contribution' of their own except calling themselves 'Garang Boys' and singing the deceptive songs of the 'Delusive New Sudan.'Now the truth is revealing itself slowly and the lairs may become ashamed soon for having attempted to cover the torch of the truth under the melting pot of the SPLM. The 2nd SPLM convention started the revelation of the truth and more revelations are still underway.

Your analysis are correct Mr. Lwanyo, but who in SPLM will listen. SPLM leaders can not listen to their supporters because is based on tribal lines. Things went wrong from the beginning in 2005 when US$ 60 million was misappropriated. Donors money is still an accounted for. GOSS is known only for corruption. NCP have known the weakness of SPLM. When SPLM pull out of GONU their demands were not met except the re-shuffle. SPLM rejected census because religion and tribe were not included on the forms, a mistake made by Luka Biong. Census went a head without fail. Abyei Ngok Dinka starts the conflict where Nuer and Shilluk SPLM soldiers died for the cause of tribal conflict between Ngok Dinka and Messeriya tribes. Ngok Dinka was not on the front line and SPLM have to pull with shame. FM Deng Alor condemned JEM attack on Omdurman and there was no out cry from SPLM of him supporting NCP. If this were to be done by some SPLM minister who is none dinka then everyone could have cried of collaboration with NCP. Salva is now heading a committee defending Bashir form indictment by ICC. It is regarded as a noble job. Come 2011 and SPLM will lock in an internal conflict and will forget the referendum. The present SPLM administration will not lead south anywhere apart from being dominated again by the north. Anyway most of SPLM leadership have foreign nationalities and their there are all abroad. They acquired houses abroad.

In my judgment there is not Garang Boys in SPLM,everybody went to bush by him or her self, faced all the challenges,and likely enough He or she survives the decades of war.

And if one of the survivors could have die,definitely no compensation for there families,that's mean they voluntarily give up their life for the sake of the country,referring to them as Garang boys is disrespect, and I think we owe respect to every body who joined SPLA to fight on our behaft.
Garang boys stand for hat's media language, no more,only his biological boys can be counted, whom I wish them bright future in the absent of their dad,due to public course.

Back to the message, I insist the chief executive is the one to be held accountable,to let that happen we need to refrain from accusing innocent people and be objective.To me the person in charge is the chief executive officer no body else.

Yes Wad Awang, you hit the nail at the head again. If Dr. Garang is considered the 'Father of the SPLM', then whoever is a member of the SPLM whether he or she joined it 24 years ago or Yesterday can be called 'Garang Boy' or 'Garang Girl' or 'Garang Orhphan'in this context. Every member of the SPLM is supposed to be looked at as 'Original SPLM' and not as an 'Infiltrator'. The SPLM was nurtured by the blood of all the freedom fighters and some of its members are not supposed to be discriminated because they support the independence of South Sudan rather than the unclear delusive ideology of New Sudan. I look at the the terms in quots here as the root causes of SPLM internal problems.

Nyaopuan, leave alone the tribalistic leader call Salva Kiir.
Say another thing, then talking about him. it make me sick

I don’t know why do we keep on beating behind the bushes, when the facts are right there in front of us? Come on now … It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out that the only reason why the SPLM pulled out from the government in late 2007, and later on reshuffled the ministers around in the government of national union when it rejoined the government was simple to remove Dr. Lam from the position of Foreign Minister, and install Deng Alor in he place … This is the naked truth, which is purely driven by nothing but tribalism, as well as illiteracy … That’s why you will never find a single written document about this major political historical event … As you said:

“I’m not quite aware why SPLM did pull out from the government, because I didn’t came across any official written request stating the reasons of pulling out.”

It is with deep regrets to admit that some of south Sudanese so-called politicians, many of whom unfortunately happened to be the top ranking official in SPLA/SPLM hierarchy are retarded, bloody, hardcore tribalists … Which makes them standout among the rest of the south Sudanese as barbaric, primitives, and uncivilized … In fact find the behavior of these shallow minded people as the only big obstacle, and a major setback that we will have to contend with (as a nation) for generations and generations to come … Yet they have the guts to claim to have been born to rule, just to add an insult to the injury to top it all up.

If these mentally handicaps were really capable of comprehending simple facts such as “success of a party at the national level depends on its unity and organization at the local level”, then they should have learned long ago from the example of the northerners. The very people we have been fighting against all these years … Northern Sudan is not one race let alone tribe, yet they are always well organized, and solidly united when it comes to their national interests ... They would rather stay united for the sake of their common interests, even if it takes them to slaughter their own Muslim fellow country men and women like what they are doing now in the Darfur region for example ... Let alone southerners who they regard as infidels.

We must be vigilant, and keep a watchful eye on these incompetents barbarous who are not even capable of differentiating between a tribe and a nation, or able to interpret/comprehend a simple treaty such as the CPA (which they already signed for) due their lack of understanding … Or they can easily drag the nation along with them back into another bloody war at anytime, which I think it will automatically turn into the worse genocide in the modern history.

Finally ... I would like to remind each and everyone of you especially those of you who live in fear of the truth that I am here speaking for myself as Marko Tipo, and myself only .... Not on behalf of Collo people in general, or pachodo.org in particular, or any other Collo affiliated organization or political party out there that you may know of.

I am also hereby authorizing pachodo.org administration team to disclose my contact information (they have on file) to anyone who tries to come after the website because of this article, and I will be more than happy to hear what they have to say … No offence …

Where were you all these time brother Marko Tip? We need people like you to put forward their truthful ideas in this website. It is a joy that you have come in now with a fierce truth that many fear to say in the open because of the intimidation they face from the liars and cheaters. Your individual opinion is highly valuable and esteemly welcomed. Keep it up and write it down elaborately as a separate article rather than a footnote. Again I stress, we need people like you to keep this website creditable with truth and relevance. May God give you more wisdom and inspiration in this right direction. Thank you.

Mr James Okuk, this is the reality that all silent people know as Mr Marko put it straight forword. Now where is our minister of foreign affairs in the case of President with the ICC? He is the spokesperson of the government of national unity in the issues related to external affairs because the issue is not concerning the president of NCP so that minister of foreign affairs could refrain or avoid any statement for the ICC case.

Dear Collo why can you register yourselves in all southerners debating board so that your voice can be heard. Joint those SPLM-Diaspora@yahoogroups.com or Splm-Canada@yahoogroups.com

Thank you Brother James for the kind words, and wishful thoughts; I fully agree with you on your suggestion that my reply to the main post should be worked on and then posted as a separate article altogether instead of a thread to another one.

I really appreciate that, and think it is a very good idea indeed. But not here, I would rather post something like this on a discussion board where these animals come to graze and drink … Sorry, I mean where these morons come to practice their communication skills and talk “politics” … Just like our Brother Wadnganjal suggested down below.

With due the respect; I would like to inform you here that; I am also currently an active member on another Sudanese discussion board; where I posted a thread of similar comments with regards to the allegations of Sudan’s Foreign Minister (Deng Alor) recent visit to Europe; to explain the impact of the ICC indictment on Al-bashir … There is currently an active debate going on on this issue … Always it is all with love, and no offense to anyone … God bless you all …

This message is not intended for anyone in particular … I only thought it would be important for me to set the records straight, and shed some more light on SPLM/A monkey business of pullout from the government in late 2007.

SPLM/A pullout from the government was a bloody, cheap joke, and a major violation of the CPA in itself … If it wasn’t intended for removing Dr. Lam from the office, then tell me what it was for that worth taking such a big risk? I know some of you would argue that SPLM/A pullout from the government was a protest, and a demonstration to denote the lack of full implementation of the CPA, as many of you were made to believe.

Boo … Hoo ... Where is it written? … The damn thing is not even documented anywhere (as you already know) … They say: if is not written, then it didn’t happen … Anyone can say anything about it at this point, but deep down in our guts, we all know the truth … And when it comes to the implementation of your so-called “CPA” however, for which some claim the pullout was allegedly intended for. You know damn well the thing still not fully implemented anyways as we speak. Now … Tell me again why did SPLM/A pulled out from the government in late 2007, and later on the only thing they did was to reshuffle around the ministers of the national unity government when they rejoined the government? If it wasn’t for the obvious reason mentioned above, then I don’t know what else to tell you?

These illiterate monkeys (for the lack of a better words to describe these retarded animals) removed form the foreign ministry the only person who knows how to read and write on the team, and replaced him with one of their own kind … E viva la facia … Should I go on, or you think you got the idea already?

It really surprises me when some intellectuals people like you come around here and ask why did the apple fall down the apple tree? … Do you really want to know the answer?

The problem with me though, is that: I always say it raw just as it is, but with love and respect for everyone, and no offense to anyone … May God bless you all …

Hello Brother Lwanyo,

I couldn’t help it to notice from the very moment I read your article that the statement I quoted below is somehow incorrect. Unfortunately, I didn’t have any supporting documents handy at the time to counter your claim. However, I finally managed to dig up something.

I don’t know from what source are you getting your information? You stated here:

“That’s the norms of the governments’ operations world wide principles. No minister can go against the will of the chief executive, but he / she can resign from the government or the all whole party can pull out from the government like what SPLM did last year, 2007.”

That is true to a certain extend, but not necessarily the absolute truth … Have you ever heard of the so-called “floor crossing”?

"Crossing the floor" means to leave one's political party and join another, or in a more general sense, to vote against one's own party. However, the term now applies to any political defection. Even a cabinet minister can cross the floor in some cases, as it is shown below in the example of Canadian politics.

“From May to July 1990, several Quebec members of the Progressive Conservatives, including cabinet minister Lucien Bouchard, left the party to sit as independent MPs.” Remember, they didn’t resign but left the party to sit as independent MPs. Including a cabinet minister.

Please excuse my ignorance, and correct me if I am wrong. Leaving one’s own party to sit as an independent MP; isn’t it the same as going “against the will of the chief executive” you are talking about here, or you’re referring to something else?

For more information please refer to: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdngovernment/crossing.html

I always say it raw … Just as it is, but with love and respect for everyone, and no offense to anyone … May God bless you all.

What I meant by statment no minister can go aganist the will of chief executive,is because if thing went wrong he is the one to be held accountable,and you can not held somebody accountable while he/she has not powers and responsibilites to direct the office according to his / her will or policy.

I think you mean the right of indiviuals to defect from their parties,and that is true,some members can cross the party line.This happen often in legislative body rather than in executive body,though it may happen.

But my article is about the powers of chief executive and his responsibilities to direct the government.

Because if the chief executve has no powers to direct the government, then who will be held accountable if things went wrong in government operations.

Government operation is like army opeartion, ministers receive directions from its chief executive,and forward that directions to the head of departments, and so on til it reaches to last subordinate in public agencies.

Over all the policy been implemented in public agencies is the the policy of chief executive,that why people refer to governments as Mr x government is a failure govenment and Mr y is a progressive government,because they are the people who have the policy in place,not the ministers, they are simply the implementors of the policy.