- Written/Submitted by Deng Riak Khoryoam
- Category: Pachodo.org Latest English Articles
- Hits: 975
In his apparent response to the press releases issued consecutively by Fangak community in Diaspora and Nuer Supreme council condemning the recent massacres meted on the people of Fangak by George Athor, Michael Mthaing decided to come out into the open defending the SPLA, which is now suffering from credibility problem.
I am beginning to sense something here; and it's that he is either oblivious of the realities on the ground or masquerading not to know what is happening with the-would-be national army, the Sudan People Liberation Army (SPLA).
Since you are ignorant on this particular issue, let me devote my precious time and energy to educate you about it, which I think will help you in the future to have a superficial analysis of the issues at hand other than just relying on mere assumptions. The interim period, which is from 2005 to July 2011 when the CPA officially comes to an end; was meant, among other things, to transform the SPLA from its guerrilla warfare mentality to a national and professional army. Unfortunately, and for obvious reasons, this did not happen as the resources (money) meant for this crucial program was misappropriated and mismanaged in a widespread corruption; the generals (including Athor himself) amassed it to themselves and nothing was left to undertake this.
So your question on whether the SPLA is a national or a tribal army is indeed a rhetorical question in all sense of the word, which you shamelessly shied away from answering it yourself. The real question is: when did SPLA become a national army, let alone being professional? The other questions that could spring up from sound-minded person are: what makes an army a national army? Is it by numerical size and strength or by upholding certain principles related to their national duties and in line with the article 155 of the interim constitution? It's worth noting that what we have in South Sudan is not a national army but a kind of tribal army protecting the parochial interests of the few at the expense of the majority. And to prove my point right beyond doubt, I will present two cases as a back-up or examples to the foregoing discussion on the supposedly national army.
The first case is about the two incidents which happened in Malakal, one in November 25-27 2006 and the second one in February 2009. In these two incidences, Gabriel Tanginye, a pro-government former militia leader and a SAF general, was viciously attacked by the SPLA on the pretext that he was allied to Khartoum and was thus a threat to peace and stability in South Sudan. He had come from Khartoum to attend to family issues in Malakal, one of which was his plot that had been sold out by another person. Upon his arrival only to realize or find that he was declared ‘unwanted' person and that his stay for the specified three days was undesirable as the SPLA became more paranoid, and began to question his intentions. As a result, that unwise bloody war was fought; SPLA acted in offense and Gabriel Tanginye acted in defense, and that is a known fact though the SPLA twisted facts and fabricated the whole story in its favor.
The second case is about the fighting which occurred between Dinka and Chollo in Upper Nile state over the ownership of land. Again, instead of intervening and remaining neutral, the SPLA took side and was thus favoring Dinka and a result; despicable crimes were committed against the Chollo community, which was accused of being supported by Jallaba fighting a proxy war through its militias. Crimes of enormous proportions were committed by the SPLA on the civilians it was supposed to protect from external harm, which is their primary duty number one; please educate yourself further through my article I wrote last year about this odious killing of civilians entitled: "SPLA should stop all the heinous actsagainst the Shilluk people" (published) and you will prove this right when you read it.
Newer news items:
- SPLM/A Must Change its Official Name to Duly Reflect the Name of the New Country. - 21/02/2011
- GOSS Representative For Talks In Lonon University. - 21/02/2011
- Press Statement by the Political Parties Leadership Forum Meeting (Juba 16-17 Feb 2011) - 18/02/2011
- Padang (Khorfulus) community Diaspora press release: a clear indication the community is behind the massacre - 18/02/2011
- The Jasmine Revolution: How Worried are the Sub-Saharan African leaders? - 15/02/2011
Older news items:
- Fangak massacre: who to blame, GOSS or Athor? - 11/02/2011
- Is Abyei becoming another Kashmir in Sudan? - 09/02/2011
- Press Release: H.E. John Luk misinterpreted the terms of reference of political parties’ agreement - 01/02/2011
- The new nation should retain the name “South Sudan”! - 31/01/2011
- Breach of South-South Trust Is Dangerous Bleach - 30/01/2011
Popular news items:
- Fashoda Youth Forum Rehabilitation of Drainage Culverts in Malakal town Report - 07/08/2008 - Read 10641 times
- Press Statement:The South Sudan Political Parties Consensus Dialogue Forum - 26/09/2010 - Read 8418 times
- The Final Communique of SPLM-DC Third Session of the National Council - 29/03/2011 - Read 6595 times
- Agriculture in Southern Sudan: Challenges and Investment Opportunities - 06/10/2010 - Read 4576 times
- Henna Tattoos - Dangerous beauty? - 12/08/2008 - Read 4433 times