Sudan parties buildup to first elections in decades
- Details
- Created on Saturday, 26 September 2009 09:08
- Written by Pachodo.org News Room
JUBA, Sudan (AFP) - Major Sudanese political parties are to meet on Saturday for talks on crucial issues in the buildup to the first full elections in Africa's biggest nation for 24 years.
The Juba Conference has been put back several times but is to finally open on Saturday evening in the capital of semi-autonomous South Sudan and is scheduled to continue until Tuesday.
Even so, it will not include anyone from President Omar al-Beshir's National Congress Party, which is boycotting the event.
The conference is being hosted by the Sudan People?s Liberation Movement (SPLM), a former rebel group that since 2005 has been part of a national unity government with the NCP.
More than 2,000 people have died and 250,000 been displaced in inter-tribal violence across the south since January, according to the United Nations, with the rate of violent deaths now exceeding that of war-torn Darfur in west Sudan.
People promising to take part in the Juba meeting include Umma party leader Sadek al-Mahdi, who was elected prime minister in 1986 but overthrown three years later when Beshir launched a coup.
Islamist opposition figure Hassan al-Turabi and heads of around 20 parties and factions will also attend.
"It is a meeting to discuss (the) important issues for Sudan," namely Darfur, implementation of the 2005 peace deal that ended the 22-year civil war, the April 2010 elections and a proposed referendum in 2011 on independence for South Sudan, said Malik Agar, SPLM deputy secretary.
"We are not here (for) forming alliances," he said. "(If) you make alliances you must have an enemy. We all are Sudanese, all these parties are Sudanese, and we are all concerned about the Sudan.
"We are not grouping ourselves into alliances, we are grouping ourselves into a unified front to discuss the issues of importance," Agar told journalists.
"What we want to achieve is the continuation of the dialogue between the Sudanese parties that will lead us to a national consensus around the issues," the SPLM official said.
However, Beshir's NCP declined to attend. "We set conditions for participating in the conference but we received no reply," NCP political secretary Mandoor al-Mahdi said at a press event.
"We have therefore decided to boycott the conference," he said.
Among demands set by Beshir's Islamist movement was for all recognised Sudanese parties to receive an invitation. More than 60 have registered for the elections though several have no real political base.
The national vote has twice been delayed but April next year is currently the scheduled date for Sudanese presidential, parliamentary and regional elections.
The parliamentary poll will be the first since 1986. A presidential election after the 1989 coup confirmed Beshir in power but the opposition denounced the vote as a sham.
Another sensitive subject is the wording of a proposed law setting up the 2011 referendum on South Sudan's possible secession.
The SPLM says 50 percent plus one vote should be enough to win independence for the south while the NCP says the threshold should be 75 percent.
The two major parties from north and south Sudan also differ on who should have the right to vote in the referendum.
Fearing ballot-box stuffing, southern leaders want to restrict voting to people actually living in the south while the NCP hopes to include southerners living in the north or other countries.
Beshir is the subject of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes in Darfur.
The United Nations says up to 300,000 people have died and 2.7 million fled their homes since ethnic minority rebels in Darfur first rose up against the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum in February 2003.
Newer news items:
- Reuters: South Sudan blames northern army for violence - 05/10/2009
- Analysis: The dangers of Sudan's elections - 02/10/2009
- Kiir Is Ready to Save Northern Dinosaurs and Kill his Southern Brothers - 01/10/2009
- Sudan parties threaten to boycott elections - 01/10/2009
- NCP moves from 75% to 90% in referendum quorum - 26/09/2009
Older news items:
-
28-09-2009 16:37:25 |Unregistered| William Okuch
I do not see any political blindness here rather than political awarness which SPLM and Its GOSS lacked. CPA is being regulated internationally and regionally plus equally formed comssions from SPLM/NCP to monitor implementation process. So any party that violate its provisions shall be held accoutable by commissions and witnesses.
Now what SPLM is doing by calling opposition parties to Juba to discuss such precedented order is a seek to complicate the implementation process..
Remember that in any conference, there is decisions and those decisions have to be translated into practice. So if Juba conference emerge with new conclusion, will that not contradictory to the CPA provisions?
Will SPLM and oppositions form new body beside the one know by the world to monitor the new decision?
If SPLM and opposition come up with new process to the CPA, is it not replacement of the CPA with new system?
Now, the NCP has gave a condition that all political parties have to attend which is political wise condition to test uncivilized leaders of the so called SPLM and this condition which rejected by the SPLM. In this case, SPLM become dictator and NCP become democratic. Therefore, it will give NCP mre credit that it is willing to accept democartic transformation in Sudan.
So please give yourelf a time and sit down to assess the situation before you jump to blame me and called me enemy to SPLM and supporter to the NCP.
Look, all those parties are the national Sudanese parties and any one that follow right way deserve support. We are sick for wrong leadership for decades and it is time to correct them in every direction they follow.
Latest News/Articles
"It is a meeting to discuss (the) important issues for Sudan, namely Darfur, CPA, the April 2010 elections and a proposed referendum in 2011 on independence for South Sudan", said Malik Agar, SPLM deputy secretary.
SPLM/NCP are legally abide by the CPA to arrange all above mentioned issues being now topics for Juba conference. Beside, the partners to CPA are internationally and regionally being monitor by witnesses to the CPA.
Either SPLM or NCP has right to protest to the CPA witnesses incase other side violate the implementation process of the CPA. Therefore, there is no necessity for Juba conference. Moreover, the political parties to the Juba conference have no legitimacy to come up with other alternative beside the CPA provisions. Therefore, the conference is aim to violate the CPA.