This is a triumphant moment for peace loves. For those warmongers let them turn their heads somewhere else. No more war preaching, and denigrating SPLA freedom fighters by those hungers for power. Robert Gwang, is a hero who stood up for his right, my problem is with those opportunists who want to use this misfortune for they political again

This very Gwang was looked at as a proxy of certain party to destabilized south sudan and sabotage the referendum!how did he turn a hero in day and night?let us respect our minds.

Dr Olaw Adiang, unless you are not happy with the agreement, then that make you those war warmongers that I mention above. Robert Gwang is truly a hero, but this party that you are talking about, wanted to use this occasion to implement it hidden agenda, of sabotage the referendum. Its leader is preaching these days that because of insecurity and undemocratic norms of SPLM, referendum should some how be postponed. Dr John Garang , once said , that SPLM is just a tool that will facility democratic norms but not yet a democratic party , he was defending his position when the movement was stab at the back by the famous two PhD holds , on the pretext that Dr John garang , was some how a dictator. what a curse . I have been there my friend so I know what I am talking about. Stay well Doctor, you still have a chance to convert to the mother party SPLM.

I think u do n't know who you are talking to by saying you still h've a chance to convert to SPLM!Gwang can not be a hero and puppet at the same time!there is no way that a hero can launch a proxy war to destroy what he stands for.Bye the way am the happiest person by that agreement which brought the conflict to an end because the victims are my people and the SPLA division which fought there is the division I was trained with,and I know most of them by name,so any casualties in both side will affect me directly.please do n't claim that you are a nationalist more than others.it is good that the resolutionsof that agreement have resolved the root causes of the conflict without indulging the name of some innocence in it.which you quick recovery from your political coma

What is wrong with that agreement Dr.Olaw? I personally with the agreement because it put an end for unnecessary war, as Con.Gowang put it clearly that he didn't mean to fight SPLA forces, for he was fighting those who killed and burned down houses in Anakdiar, Abanimo, Atar, Pachodo ...et. But it seems that SPLA was protecting “them” the bad guys. Shame on you SPLA for doing that, if SPLA trained to act like that than we are in a big mess, because this is not a professional act it’s a Barbary one. You can’t defense the wrong doing because you are one of them or trained with.

We should remember why we fought the central government? I think it was because of land and we shouldn’t jock about it now. If SPLA forces are freedom fighters as Aban Kur said then where is this freedom on the ground now? Freedom fighters should make freedom not for themselves but for those whom they fought for.
So we mast bless this agreement and bring the bad guys to the justice, and let our people test...

Cde chol kudit I think u did not get me properly! I am with the agreement 100% .my point is with those who thought that Gwang was launching a proxy war for the benefit of a political party they mentioned,and when it appeared that Gwang had a case which he resolved with Authorities in the state and SPLA division 7 represented by Brig.Gen.John Kurleker,they jumped in to praise him as a hero who fought a genuine war!Hope u get me now,I did not differ with you at all.
stay blessed