I have not read the article by Mr. Isaiah Abraham to really see the insight straightforwardness analysis of South Sudan strategic interests. I must say I am somehow puzzled by your analysis.


Firstly, I don’t think that we should attribute the historic agreement between South and North Sudan to the National Congress Party (NCP), which ended the hostilities by signing of Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in 2005. It doesn’t matter whether you called it comprehensive or inclusive; it’s ended the mother of civil wars in Africa, our people struggle for independent has no parallel in African history in that it was long and completely spontaneous. The war has ended in victory of our people’s national dream for independent; historically, the South is triumphant.


Secondly, I think this would be your second article about the International Criminal Court (ICC) indictment of Hassan Omer Al Bashir in which you seemed critical of the indictment and what it will mean to the future...